Skip to content

Drop deprecated methods in invoice_utils #3762

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator

These methods are super trivial to replace with the ChannelManager equivalent, so keeping them around for a while doesn't give us anything.

These methods are super trivial to replace with the
`ChannelManager` equivalent, so keeping them around for a while
doesn't give us anything.
@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

ldk-reviews-bot commented May 1, 2025

👋 I see @valentinewallace was un-assigned.
If you'd like another reviewer assignemnt, please click here.

@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @valentinewallace! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Copy link
Contributor

@joostjager joostjager left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed that these helper methods do not help much.

@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Landed via #3763

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt closed this May 5, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@dunxen dunxen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Noting that these have been deprecated in the past with suggested replacements, it seems good to remove for 0.2.

@valentinewallace valentinewallace removed their request for review May 5, 2025 14:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants